The Judgment of leaders Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

The Judgment of leaders - Assignment ExampleBoth the internal and external societal contexts also plays a major(ip) role where organizations notably the corporate world and civil leadership atomic number 18 increasingly fragmented, and acknowledging equivocal and this has resulted into modification and change in various conventional concepts in regard to pursualhip and leadership. The key specific conventional factors include the rise of organizational crisis, ethical issues, social issues, motivation effects and corporate scandals. These factors have created uneasiness, leadership in demand(p) and inadequacies and emphasis on the search of meaning. Therefore the practical challenges underlying leadership as a business and social practice has elicited various purview of vox populi from the followers. These conventional perspectives are notably centered on the followers thus taking person-centered thus the underlying judgment rely on stereotyping and gallant leadership. Thus the judgmental influence of the followers is unidirectional flowing from the leaders to their followers representing specific perspective which reconstructs the hierarchical subject-object relations. The leader follower relationship represents widely the interactions and mechanisms between the independent individuals. Followership and its judgmental on the leadership are important because the latter cannot exist without the other. Therefore it is important to determine the leader-centric focus and how the followers calculate and understanding interdependence of leadership and its active fellowship. The bottom line on how followers judge leaders is how leadership is shared and the leaders judgment on his or her followers. Leader-Follower centrality Relational qualities uniting leadership-followership notably have significant influence on Followership judgment on their leaders. This begins with the leadership perception to his or her congeneric followers and to himself. This forms the foundation in which the followers judge the leaders because the self other perception influences greatly the followers perception. Notably in regard to this are the followers judgments that favor leaders power and authority over them. This is common where the followers exhibit dominant motif and in this case the followers look compliant and can be easily manipulated even at the extreme ends (Oddenino, 2003). In organizations and corporate world subordinates within dominance motif incur abused but they cannot do anything. The managers and CEOs say that leadership is when pain inflicted is demonstrated for effectiveness to be achieved. The subordinates within dominance motif judge their supervisors and managers with the assumption of plebeian dependency idea in their organizations as well as the value of maintaining personal dignity (Weibler, 2011). The subordinates are cowed in their judgments therefore leaders are apparent to get deprived of accurate and honesty information. Thi s fuels self-absorption and self-deception resulting in the fall of arbitrary power. GROUPTHINK According to Ladkin (2010) in his study on organizational leadership provides that Groupthink is pick out by most followers in judging their leaders. This is where there agreement and consensus is far much important than the solution, in this case followers adopt practical alternative courses of action in their judgments (Ladkin, 2010). This is common in organizations and